IS Home Numbers Ledger A Ledger B Ledger C Ledger D Ledger E Who Method Sources
STORIESFORDAYS.COM/AUDIT

The El Paso Audit Record

Whether the City checks its own work, in the City's own documents

Read the record
Scroll  ·  Independent  ·  Every claim cited
FIG. 00 — Standing disclosure
This is not a City of El Paso publication. It is an independent project run by an El Paso resident. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, funded by, or connected to the City of El Paso, its Internal Audit Department, or the Financial Oversight and Audit Committee — a committee of the El Paso City Council. Nothing here is an official city communication. Everything here is drawn from documents the City publishes about itself, and every one of them is cited.
FIG. 01 — The question

Does the record show anyone checking?

Four kinds of published document, read against each other

The City of El Paso publishes annual audit plans, quarterly hour ledgers, consultant assessments, and a policies manual describing exactly how its own oversight is supposed to work. This record reads those documents against each other and reports what they show — including where a promise made in one document doesn't appear in the ones that follow.

AUDIT PLANS · HOUR LEDGERS ASSESSMENTS · POLICY MANUAL FINDING INTERNAL AUDIT PROMISE MANAGEMENT RESPONSE ? FOLLOW-UP — UNRESOLVED THE PROMISE DOESN’T APPEAR IN THE DOCUMENTS THAT FOLLOW

It takes no position on whether any specific agreement was a good idea. It asks a narrower question: when the City's own auditors find something and management promises to fix it, does the record show anyone checking?

FIG. 02 — Five ways in

The record, opened five ways

Numbers, ledger, sources, authorship, method

02.A The Numbers Coverage, capacity, and where the audit hours actually go — computed from the City's own published figures → 02.B The Ledger 24 specific, checkable claims made by officials and utilities, tested against the public record — five clusters → 02.C Sources Every document used, with a link, a date, and how it was obtained → 02.D Who runs this Named authorship and a full conflicts disclosure → 02.E Method What this does, what it refuses to do, and how to prove it wrong →
24 CLAIMS LEDGER A LEDGER B LEDGER C LEDGER D LEDGER E TESTED AGAINST THE PUBLIC RECORD EVERY ONE OF THEM CITED
Filed  ·  Forthcoming

A scored evaluation of the FY2026–27 audit plan launches September 2026, against criteria already published.

IS
Infinitive Storytelling  ·  storiesfordays.com/audit
0