body.collection-slug-your-page-slug .sections { margin: 0 !important; padding: 0 !important; }
The network has constructed a prosecution immunity system operating in four mutually reinforcing layers: pre-prosecution, where investigations become politically radioactive; during prosecution, where evidence problems become the permanent narrative regardless of the verdict; post-conviction, where the pardon pipeline rewards network access over legal merit; and post-pardon, where civil litigation makes the government financially liable for having prosecuted at all.
The entry requirement is not ideology. OneTaste is not a conservative organization. They accessed the network because they could frame their prosecution as weaponization and pay the operators to make that framing credible. The network is transactional. The weaponization narrative is the product being sold, not the conviction being defended.
Federal prosecutors are not unaware. The rational response for a career federal prosecutor is not corruption - it is avoidance. Cases that touch this network carry disproportionate professional risk and the prospect of becoming defendants in civil suits. That chilling effect is more durable than any individual pardon. It sustains itself through incentive structures alone, and it is already operating.