Enterprise Transformation
What BCG delivers vs. what actually gets built. The execution layer consulting skips.
See the frameworkConsulting delivers roadmaps. Operators need shipping plans.
Most transformation consulting follows the same pattern: 200-slide roadmap, Gantt chart, phases, and maturity models. Beautiful. Generic. Never executed.
The operator gets the deck but no answer to: What ships next quarter? Who owns it? How do I know it worked? What happens when one assumption breaks?
This is the structural failure of every Big Consulting roadmap. It is a calendar of intentions, not a sequenced plan of deployable work.
BCG charges $750K for these. You can deliver them.
The sequencing layer that transforms roadmaps into executable plans.
Adversarial or Sandbox?
Two paths. Completely different outcomes.
Expose the pattern
Publish findings. Name the corruption vectors. Demand accountability.
Result: You're outside the system. You win morally. You lose practically. All three parties resist.
Build transparent systems
Don't expose. Solve. Offer governance systems that make honesty easier than dishonesty.
Result: You're inside the system. You change behavior through incentive alignment. All three parties benefit.
This is a 30-40% revenue upsell.
Add execution layer to every transformation engagement.
Current engagement
- $750K diagnostic + roadmap
- 12 weeks to deliver plan
- Client executes (or doesn't)
- You move to next deal
Your model
- $750K diagnostic
- $250K sequencing + governance
- $500K execution support
- $1.5M total · 24 weeks
Client gets
- Quarterly shipping plan (not phases)
- Governance that prevents corruption at scale
- Political resistance engineered out
- Revenue model connected to sequencing